BRINGIN’ SEXY BACK
Thin Brick Vaulting –Making the Old New – a More
Sustainable Approach
The 2011-2012 McMurrin Professorship brought Dr. John A.
Ochsedorf to the University of Utah School of Architecture for a two-day
workshop on March 19th and 20th. Dr. Ochsendorf is an
Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and Architecture at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and partner at the engineering firm
ODB-Engineering.
Through the ambitiously valiant efforts U of U professors
Ryan Smith, Patrick Tripeny, and Robert Young, the McMurrin Fellowship brought
to Salt Lake City professors and professionals John Ochsendorf – MIT, Kent
Diebolt – Vertical Access, Mallory Taub – University of California at Berkeley,
and Benjamin Ibarra Sevilla – University of Minnesota.
This
unprecedented workshop provided students with an invaluable lesson in design –
from the value of history, design methodologies, explorative geometries,
construction methods and materials, building constraints, and hands-on building
experience.
As
far as I know, never has the School of Architecture hosted a workshop of this
caliber; and this was the first of its kind for John too. During the workshop
for undergraduate students, we learned about the thin brick or tile vault
building in the tradition of Guastavino. The famous Guastavino vaults can be
found all over Europe and throughout the United States. John’s book, Guastavino Vaulting: The Art of Structural Tile, goes into much more depth about the
incredible structural integrity, longevity, and beauty of think brick
structures based on catenary curves. John’s passionate research has shined in
his effort to preserve historic buildings, and more and more people are
catching on as more light is shed upon his ideas. His most notable work is that
of the South Africa Mapungubwe National Park where he worked in conjunction with architects Peter Rich and Michael Ramage. It received an African/Middle
East regional prize form the 2008 Holcim Awards for Sustainable Construction as
well as Building of the Year in 2009 at the World Architecture Festival in
Barcelona.
Through
provocative lectures and an involved design challenge, we learned of the
tradition of vaulting, explored the catenary geometries, designed a series of
vaults, and then built them using thin bricks and Plaster of Paris
On Monday morning John introduced the team of faculty and
visiting professors who ran the show. John then briefly lectured on the
significance of vaulting both anciently and modern. The informative and
energetic presentation opened my eyes to the value in design, the appreciation
for the past, and a more clearly defined architecture in the future.
At the end of the lecture we were split up into ten
groups of approximately seven students and then presented with the design
challenge: “Deploy 300 bricks…”
We were given 300 bricks, the necessary amount of Plaster
of Paris, two sheets of 4’x8’ OSB (one to be used as a base and one to build
our formwork), 2”x4”s and some masonry tools…oh, and only 12 hours to build. That’s
it. Nothing more. Nada.
CRUNCH TIME! This fast-paced, fun exercise threw us
directly into the design process with randomly selected teams. We were given
two hours to explore designs, decide on one, develop it, finalize it, and
present it to John and our group advisor. After much exploration, sketching,
paper model building, research, and deliberation, our team decided on a more
classical and elegant approach. We resorted back to the sophisticated design of
the Guastavino groin vault in the New York City Hall Subway Station. We resorted
back to its strong aesthetic beauty and simple structure. Our team advisor
Benjamin was extremely helpful in helping us understand how to make our design
sturdy, standable, and buildable. For us, the groin vault met these criteria
best. And so we built – first the forms and then with brick.
Check out the other impressive designs from our
classmates:
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Group 5
Group 8
Group 9
Check out my favorite - our team's design. Our groin vault slowly transformed into a sail vault.
I loved getting my hands dirty in this exercise. I’d worked in the construction industry for a long time before architecture school
and I know what it means to get my hands dirty, but I can honestly say that it
had been a while. It was refreshingly messy. Building models out of museum
board, cardboard, foam core etc. or working in the workshop with metal or wood
just isn’t the same. We don’t get dirty enough as architects – and I think
that’s the problem with most of them…I mean us.
There were invaluable lessons to be learned about
materials, craft, design build, changing and/or ameliorating your design,
sometimes sacrificing parts of your design, and streamlining the process of
designing and building as a team. I
loved the close, intimate working relationship with the visiting faculty and
their eagerness to get their hands a little dirty to with the solo intent of
guiding us. To be honest, we simply could not have done it without the help of
Ben. He was our saving grace. When our hands would go up in the air out of desperation,
Ben would come to the rescue. Mallory quickly showed us how to mix mud, staying
clean while mixing but getting dirty while building. Kent’s subtle but
judicious advice always came unexpectedly at the right moment.
I would do this again in a heartbeat here or elsewhere –
it adds value to anyone’s education. Although the graduate students did not
participate, their on-looking eyes and very long glances at our process and
final products exposed their inner jealousy. They could not help but divert
their attention to the hustle and bustle throughout the school and out into the
loading dock by the wood shop. We were messy. We were really messy actually,
tracking mortar to and fro. Many literally followed our footsteps outside to
the projects. We all learned – even the host faculty. This practice was more of
a disciplined training – a drill on how to push the design within given
constraints…and then…hopefully, build it to last.
Keepn' it classy proved best - the only vault the faculty hopped on.
|
If I took anything out of the workshop with John, I
learned how inherent design constraints could empower innovation. John
specifically taught clearly on two occasions: “Without constraints there is no
design.” I truly believe his design philosophy and have tried to employ that
principle in my designs without even knowing it. Although many students claim
it, I truly try to keep things simple in my work while focusing on the
constraints of a design and then using them as an aesthetic, structural, or
programmatic opportunity. However, his succinct words hit home. It rang a
bell that did not seem too unfamiliar, but still inspired architectural
revelation. Our team truly found strength in our constraints – constraint of
material, constraints of time, and even constrains within the team and our
not-so-professional brick laying skills. Now, personally, I can more consciously focus on how constraints make rich, dynamic designs.
But let it be rest assured that our desire to learn and
our experience building thin brick vaults were completely and utterly
unconstrained. We tackled the design sun, sleet, or snow (literally). The
impact of this unique workshop will undoubtedly resonate throughout the School
of Architecture and the students’ work for some time.
Thanks John!
Thank you David!
ReplyDeleteIt was a thrill for all of us to be involved, and we are pleased that you gained so much from the workshop. And thank you for this wonderful blog as well.
Best of luck to you and your classmates,
John
I like your post. Exterior home stone applications made of Stone Veneer or brick veneer are becoming one of the best home improvement that can not only enhance your home exterior, but also bring with it increased home value and curb appeal.
ReplyDelete